Archive for January, 2011

25
Jan
11

The Tabernacle and the Garden of Eden

I was fascinated by the picture that developed when recently studying chapters 25 and 26 of the book of Exodus. These two chapters are an introduction to the design of the tabernacle as given Moses when he ascended Sinai.

 Chapter 25 begins with Moses given instructions by Yahweh to call for a freewill offering to be given by those who had recently been delivered from the house of bondage. They were asked to give precious stones and metals, fabrics and skins, oils and perfumes for use in the dwelling that would be inhabited by the presence of God.

 Rather than examine the Tabernacle from a 21st century evangelical Christian perspective and relating to everything within the structure through a fulfilled Christian perspective, I wanted to see if I could see Christ from the perspective of a recently freed slave who had just agreed to join in covenant with the Creator at Mount Sinai. They had agreed to na’aseh ve-nishma – or, “we will do and we will hear.” They had accepted the constitution that would distinguish them as a peculiar people, a holy nation; a kingdom of priests to the nations.

 Examining the Tabernacle from the perspective of a Hebrew who had just recently been freed made me think about what these children would have known about the giving of sacrifices and offerings. Was their perspective molded by years of influence by Egyptian polytheism and animism? Or was their perspective founded on an understanding of the creation story, a story that began with an intimate relation between the Creator and his creation in the Garden of Eden, knowledge of the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge, and an awareness of the disruption of this relationship through the disobedience of mankind. If the Hebrew children were aware of the story of the fall of Adam and Eve, they were also aware of the cost to cover the newfound nakedness of Adam and Eve.

 Adam was charged with being the caretaker of the Garden (Gen 2:15) and as caretaker was responsible for the wellbeing of all creatures in the Garden. Genesis 2:20 states that Adam “gave names to all the livestock, the birds of the air and all the beasts of the field.” I believe that Adam and Eve knew the innocent creature that served as their substitute, whose life was taken on their behalf.  from this, I believe the Hebrews were aware of the idea of “substitutionary atonement.”

 Looking at the initial instructions given to Moses, I found it interesting that they began with the Most Holy Place. I believe Yahweh did this on purpose and that it was to show Moses a picture of the Garden of Eden. To begin, the Ark of the Covenant is a picture of the throne of God, and that in the Garden he was approachable upon his throne.

 2 Samuel 6:2b describes the ark in this manner, “the ark of God, which is called by the Name, the name of the LORD Almighty, who is enthroned between the cherubim that are on the ark.”

 Outside of the Most Holy Place, Moses was given instructions for the Holy Place. Moses was given instructions for construction of two pieces of furniture; the Menorah or Golden Lampstand, and the Table of Showbread or the Table for the Bread of the Presence.

The Menorah was fashioned after an almond tree and was designed to represent both the Tree of Life and the creation story. The Menorah is described as having one shaft and six branches. The “one” shaft is a picture of the one God as described in Deuteronomy 6:4, “Hear, O Israel: The LORD our God, the LORD is one. The “six” branches represent the six days of creation which culminated with the creation of man. Together they form the complete number seven. It is only when man has joined himself to God that he can become complete. That is the purpose of the Tabernacle; to provide a way for us to be reconciled with our Creator.

 The Table of the Bread of the Presence would be a picture of the harvest from the Tree of Life. Revelation 22 presents what I believe to be another picture of the Edenic structure. Revelation 22 speaks of the restoration of all things and begins with a picture that strongly resembles that of the Garden. Genesis 2:10 notes, 1 A river watering the garden flowed from Eden,” while Revelation 22 begins with this picture, “Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb 2 down the middle of the great street of the city. On each side of the river stood the tree of life, bearing twelve crops of fruit, yielding its fruit every month. And the leaves of the tree are for the healing of the nations.”

 Twelve is a number that biblically speaks of governance or authority. The day is governed by twelve hours, as is the night. The year is divided by twelve months. It should be noted that the 12 loaves placed on the Table of the Bread of the Presence do not represent just the 12 tribes of Israel. As mention earlier and found in Exodus 19:6, the nation was to be a kingdom of priest. They were to bring the gospel message to the nations. Therefore, all the nations of the world are represented through the twelve tribes of Israel. 

 The picture in Revelation 22 is of the Tree of Life producing food, and for the healing of the nations.

 It is also important to recognize the Tree of Life as symbolic of God’s word. Psalm 119:105 states, “Your word is a lamp to my feet and a light for my path.” The disciple John in chapter 1:9 of his gospel says this in reference of Yeshua; “The true light that gives light to every man was coming into the world. John also said of Yeshua that, “The Word became flesh and made his dwelling among us. We have seen his glory, the glory of the One and Only, who came from the Father, full of grace and truth.”It is not difficult to see that he Menorah represents both the Tree of Life and the Word of God.

 Conspicuously absent from the Holy Place is the Altar of Incense. I believe the absence of the altar in this first layout is that it was not present in the Garden. The purpose of the Altar of Incense was to create a barrier that would protect the High Priest from the direct presence of God. Leviticus 16:13 states, “He is to put the incense on the fire before the LORD, and the smoke of the incense will conceal the atonement cover above the Testimony, so that he will not die.”

 Scriptural evidence, Genesis 3:8, shows that man did not hide from the Presence of God until he had committed his first act of disobedience. Then the man and his wife heard the sound of the LORD God as he was walking in the garden in the cool of the day, and they hid from the LORD God among the trees of the garden.”

 It is not until Exodus 27, after the instructions for both the Most Holy Place and the Holy Place, that we are introduced to anything relating to sacrifice and that is found first in the outer court. Is it possible that the outer court is symbolic of that area which was outside of Eden? Hebrews 13 speaks of both the atoning sacrifice and Jesus being offered outside of the city of Jerusalem.  Jesus “also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood. Let us, then, go to him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace he bore.”  Hebrews 13:12-13.

 I am convinced that the Tabernacle is designed to show us the path of reconciliation. The path of reconciliation is designed to lead us to Christ. Our reconciliation/salvation is found in Christ alone. The purpose of the Tabernacle was to reveal Christ through foreshadows to the children of Israel. The purpose, or goal, of this law is to bring us to Christ. Understanding the purpose and function of the Tabernacle may lead us to a better understanding of our Messiah. I believe that the spiritual offspring of Abraham were able to see both the past and the future through this sacrificial system.

It is certainly clear from the Apostolic Scriptures (New Testament) that the  apostles recogognized him in this capacity. John the Baptist called him the “Lamb of God who takes away the sins of the world“. John the Beloved said, “he is the atoning sacrifice for our sins.” Peter called Jesus, “a lamb without blemish or defect.” The Apostle Paul also referred to him in this manner. In the book of Romans, Paul referred to Yeshua as a “sin offering.” James says that through Christ we have become a “kind of firstfruits.”

Each of these statements recognizes Yeshua in a different sacrificial sense. It is evident through the reading of the Apostolic Scriptures that these authors recognized the fulfillment of these ordinances through Christ. I believe it is because they understood the regulations to be mere foreshadows of the reality that was found in Christ. Foreshadows that were given at Sinai and pondered  and believed by the believing children of Israel.

 Shalom

09
Jan
11

Chapter Two – The War in the Womb

 

“And the children struggled together within her; and she said, If it be so, why am I thus? And she went to enquire of the LORD. And the LORD said unto her, “Two nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels; and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.”  Genesis 25:22-23 NIV 

Chapter Two

 

The War in the Womb

 

The account goes on to say that there were two children in the womb of Rebekah and that the children struggled with each other within her. The Hebrew word translated as struggled -wuurtyw, pronounced ratsats,[1] (Strong’s 7533) is most frequently interpreted as crush, or grievously oppress. The NET Notes for Genesis 25:22 state, “The Hebrew word used here suggests a violent struggle that was out of the ordinary.”[2] Was there a spiritual battle being fought within the womb of Rebekah that followed the prophetic theme of Genesis 3:15?

 The choice of words to describe this event should not be overlooked. 2 Timothy 3:16 clearly states that,

 “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness,”[3]  

 The inspiration of God is that he wants us to understand that this struggle in the womb of Rebekah was not caused by indigestion. It is spiritual in nature. The wrestling of the twins within her womb distressed Rebekah and she recognized that there was something going on that was out of the ordinary. Genesis 25:22 states regarding Rebekah, “… so she went to enquire of the LORD.”[4]

 Jewish legends state (and biblical chronology permits), that Rebekah sought out the council of Shem and Eber.[5] Shem, the son of Noah, and his grandson, Eber, were considered Godly men, and were known as prophets of God.

 Genesis 9:26 informs us of Shem’s relationship with the Almighty, “Worthy of praise is the Lord, the God of Shem! May Canaan be the slave of Shem!”[6]  Abraham is a descendant of Shem. The idea of the God-fearing Shem being involved in the lives of his offspring, even having a personal relationship with Abraham, should not be difficult to accept.

 The book of 1 Samuel lends support that when Rebekah went “to enquire of the LORD“, she would have been seeking the council of godly men – prophets – to enquire of the Lord on her behalf. 1 Samuel 9:9 says,

 (Beforetime in Israel, when a man went to enquire of God, thus he spake, Come, and let us go to the seer: for he that is now called a Prophet was beforetime called a Seer.)[7]

 The story continues with the LORD revealing to Rebekah that two nations, or two distinct camps, were represented in her womb, and that the firstborn would serve the younger. The birth account continues with,

  “And the first came out red, all over like an hairy garment; and they called his name Esau. And after that came his brother out, and his hand took hold on Esau’s heel; and his name was called Jacob:[8] 

 It is important to note from this account the name of each child and the meaning given to their names. The name Esau, wve, Esav, means hairy, and the name Jacob, bqey, Ya ‘aqob, means heel holder or hand on heel.  It is only after Esau’s selling of the birthright that we find his name to also includes the meaning of, “Edom, or, Red.” It is not until the conferring of the blessing by Isaac that we are introduced to Esau’s version of what Ya ‘aqob means. We will address the name later.

 The reader should understand that the naming of the Esau and Jacob is not at all happenstance, but that it is intended to show progressive prophetic fulfillment of Genesis 3:15. Jacob is holding the heel of his brother to protect himself from the crushing blow of the adversary.

 It is the intent of the serpent to avoid the curse of God placed upon him in the Garden. His plan is to crush the head of the righteous seed present in the womb of Rebekah before that seed, in its maturity, can bring forth the serpent’s destruction through the promised Messiah.


[1]The Brown, Driver, Briggs Hebrew and Lexicon; C. Briggs, Francis Brown, S. Driver, Hendrickson Publishing, 1996

[2] Notes taken from the NET Bible® footnotes, copyright (c) 1996-2006 by Biblical Studies Press L.L.C. All rights reserved. Used by permission from http://bible.org

[3] Holy Bible, New International Version

[4] KJV

[5] Rashi

[6] NET Bible®

[7] 1 Samuel 9:9 KJV

[8] Genesis 25:25-26 KJV

09
Jan
11

Chapter One – Esau and Jacob

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman,

and between thy seed and her seed;

 it shall bruise thy head,

 and thou shalt bruise his heel.” Genesis 3:15 KJV

 

Chapter One

 

Esau and Jacob

 

 

The story of Esau and Jacob does not really begin in Genesis chapter 25. It begins in the prophecy of God spoken to the serpent, “the Father of Lies”, in the Garden of Eden.

 

And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel.”[1]

Differing from the King James, the Vulgate, (a fifth century Latin translation of the Bible), uses two different verbs in the latter part of this verse. To describe what the woman’s seed would do to the serpent it uses the verb conterere, which meansto crush.” To describe what the serpent would do to the woman’s seed, it uses the verb insidari, or “to lie in wait.” [2]

This prophecy of enmity is lived out in the lives of Cain and Abel, and is evident again in the story of the birth of Esau and Jacob as told in Genesis 25. Cain and Esau each demonstrated contempt for the ways of God in their chosen course of rebellion. Cain, through the murder of righteous Abel, and Esau, through his godless lifestyle, disdain for his birthright and his plan, like Cain, to kill his brother Jacob. This prophecy is ultimately fulfilled through the victory of Jesus over sin and death at Calvary.

Regarding the lives of Jacob and Esau, we find that in the beginning the womb of their mother Rebekah was barren, and that their father Isaac prayed to the LORD that he would open her womb. Biblical evidence suggests that Isaac might have prayed as long as twenty years for his wife to receive the seed promised to him and his father Abraham. Ultimately, Genesis 25:21 says,

The LORD answered his prayer, and his wife Rebekah became pregnant.


[1] Genesis 3:15, Holy Bible, King James Version

[2] Vulgate; Genesis 3:15; “inimicitias ponam inter te et mulierem et semen tuum et semen illius ipsa conteret caput tuum et tu insidiaberis calcaneo eius” http://www.biblestudytools.com/vul/genesis/3-15.html, retrieved June 22, 2010




Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 7 other subscribers